Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term scheduling

From: Tony Finch <dot_at_DOTAT.AT>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 10:42:24 +0000

On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, Rob Seaman wrote:
>
> It's not the correct time under the current standard if the
> timekeeping model doesn't implement leap seconds correctly. I don't
> think this is an impossible expectation, see http://
> www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/exec.html, starting with the Levine and
> Mills PTTI paper.

As http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/leap.html shows, NTP (with kernel
support) is designed to stop the clock over the leap second, which I
don't call "correct". Without kernel support it behaves like a "pinball
machine" (according to Mills).

Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch  <dot_at_dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
SOUTHEAST ICELAND: CYCLONIC 6 TO GALE 8, BECOMING VARIABLE 4 FOR A TIME. ROUGH
OR VERY ROUGH. OCCASIONAL RAIN OR WINTRY SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD.
Received on Sun Jan 07 2007 - 03:02:42 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 04 2010 - 09:44:55 PDT