Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap seconds
On Jan 8, 2006, at 5:38 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> As I understood it, it was mainly that TAI is a post-factum
> "postal" timescale.
One is left pondering the fact that UTC is now (and would remain
under any changes I've heard suggested) a time scale based on TAI.
What magic makes one acceptable and the other not?
Received on Sun Jan 08 2006 - 08:05:37 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Sat Sep 04 2010 - 09:44:55 PDT