Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap seconds

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Ed Davies <ls_at_EDAVIES.NILDRAM.CO.UK>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:46:23 +0000

Markus Kuhn wrote:
> Ed Davies wrote on 2006-01-13 11:45 UTC:
>
>>The use of the 23:59:60 notation is described in ISO 8601.
>>Is it also specified in TF.460?
>
>
> It originally comes from ITU-R TF.460, which is a standard for radio
> time signals.

OK, thanks.

Ed.
Received on Fri Jan 13 2006 - 07:06:59 PST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Richard Langley: "Problems with GLONASS Raw Receiver Data at Start of New Year"
Previous message: Ed Davies: "Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap seconds"
In reply to: Markus Kuhn: "Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap seconds"
Next in thread: Warner Losh: "Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap seconds"
Reply: Warner Losh: "Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap seconds"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 04 2010 - 09:44:55 PDT