On Jan 14, 2006, at 8:59 AM, Richard Langley wrote:
> The problem existed for only 2-1/2 minutes, not hours.
Thanks for the clarification.
> Might be coincidental with the leap second but I've not noticed
> this problem at other times.
Would be a significant coincidence. Any simple explanation for the
90 second lag in the issue being triggered? The latency associated
with emergent behavior is of interest in itself.
> Stations were not running during the previous leap second.
Right - that's a central fact influencing policy. That different
groups take this to imply that different choices should be made adds
a little spice to the discussion :-)
> UNB1 Web page is here: <http://gge.unb.ca/Resources/UNB1.html>.
> IGS Central Bureau Web page is here: <http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/>
Thanks for the pointers.
Rob Seaman
NOAO
Received on Sun Jan 15 2006 - 06:22:51 PST