Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap seconds
On Fri 2006/01/13 12:32:27 +1100, Mark Calabretta wrote
in a message to: Leap Seconds Issues <LEAPSECS_at_ROM.USNO.NAVY.MIL>
>So if asked for a definition I would say that "UTC (post 1972) is a
>representation of TAI such that ... (you know the rest)".
.. and I should have said that prior to 1972, when UTC had "rubber
seconds", it was not a representation of TAI but something else again.
Mark Calabretta
ATNF
Received on Mon Jan 16 2006 - 16:15:34 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Sat Sep 04 2010 - 09:44:55 PDT