Re: [LEAPSECS] NOT A cruel fraud!

From: Peter Bunclark <psb_at_ast.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 18:51:23 +0000 (GMT)

On Sun, 22 Jan 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>
> The short answer is that you cannot get a time feed of TAI, so the
>
So isn't this one of the things we want to fix in the brave new world of
joined-up timekeeping? Distribute (very close to) TAI, keep the kernel
PLLs sweet, move leap second handling to user-space and thus make
debugging very easy, then everone can get their timescale of choice as
a f(TAI)?

Peter.
Received on Sun Jan 22 2006 - 10:52:05 PST