Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensus

From: Michael Sokolov <msokolov_at_IVAN.HARHAN.ORG>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 03:41:10 GMT

John Cowan <cowan_at_CCIL.ORG> wrote:

> All your points are correct, but it doesn't change the fact that
> there was no 1845-12-31 in Manila, any more than there was a
> second labeled 2006-04-02T00:02:30 in New York.
                            ^^^^^^^^

Perhaps you meant 2006-04-02T02:30:00?

MS
Received on Mon Jun 05 2006 - 20:41:29 PDT