Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal Article

From: Joe Fitzgerald <jfitzgerald_at_ALUM.WPI.EDU>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:36:02 -0400

Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

> And 62 o'clock happened precisely because leapseconds are untestable
> in practice for programmers.
>


I have written (and tested) data logging software for proper leap second
handling. What am I missing?

-Joe Fitzgerald
Received on Fri Jul 29 2005 - 14:46:17 PDT