In message <BCE68C36-55DF-4054-A981-C310C0CDA209_at_noao.edu>, Rob Seaman writes:
>On Aug 11, 2005, at 9:51 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>A hurried solution that ignores pertinent input is extremely unlikely
>to prove acceptable.
I've asked now twice, and I guess that I should get the clue from
your continued non-response, but I would prefer a completely
straight answer from you:
Will you support a proposal that keeps leap-second (or -minutes),
but mandates that they be determined 40 or 50 years in advance ?
If you do, will you help write it ?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Thu Aug 11 2005 - 11:51:36 PDT