Re: [LEAPSECS] decision tree for civil time

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk_at_haven.freebsd.dk>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 22:48:07 +0200

In message <19B87E06-1B02-49BD-92FF-0DF53109CC0E_at_noao.edu>, Rob Seaman writes:


>> 3) maximize scheduling horizon.
>
>That's one of the issues with leap hours - it's easy to maximize a
>schedule, simply never do something. I believe this is really a
>question of imposing a fixed schedule that happens to be of long
>duration. Perhaps I misunderstood your point.

This is the main objection to leapseconds as they are now: we get
too short notice.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Sat Aug 13 2005 - 13:48:21 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 04 2010 - 09:44:54 PDT