Re: [LEAPSECS] Draft Questionnaire

From: Roger Stapleton <jrs_at_ST-ANDREWS.AC.UK>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 16:10:42 +0000 (GMT)

There is a question missing from the questionaire -

        Should 2100 be a leap year?

If we are abandoning leapseconds should we abandon the current calendar
fix about divisibility by 400? We may as well!

I wonder what would have broken if 2000 had _not_ been a leap year ;-)

Sorry - I will go back into hiding.

                        Roger

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roger Stapleton jrs_at_st-and.ac.uk
University of St.Andrews, School of Physics & Astronomy
North Haugh, St.Andrews, Fife. KY16 9SS
Phone 01334-463141 Fax 01334-463104
Received on Mon Jan 20 2003 - 08:21:07 PST