Re: [LEAPSECS] what is broken?

From: Steve Allen <sla_at_ucolick.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 13:18:28 -0700

On Tue 2000-09-19T15:58:49 -0400, Fred Patt hath writ:
> I can provide such an example.

Thank you. Now may we discuss?

> At NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, we run satellite orbit models which typical
> generate ephemeris data on 1-minute intervals, synchronized with UTC. Our
> spacecraft data streams are likewise time-tagged to UTC.

What is the lifetime of this system?

Why was UTC chosen rather than TAI?
Was it merely that UTC was more conveniently available than TAI?

If TAI were as conveniently available as UTC, would the same choice be
made again?

--
Steve Allen          UCO/Lick Observatory       Santa Cruz, CA 95064
sla_at_ucolick.org      Voice: +1 831 459 3046     http://www.ucolick.org/~sla
PGP: 1024/E46978C5   F6 78 D1 10 62 94 8F 2E    49 89 0E FE 26 B4 14 93
Received on Tue Sep 19 2000 - 13:18:29 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 04 2010 - 09:44:54 PDT